Friday, September 30, 2005

Hegemony.

For a long time, I didn't know the Internet was controlled by the United States. If I knew, I probably would never have tried it. That last bit was a lie, and a huge one. So anyway. It seems that, since the Internet is so mainstream now, there should be some kind of world organization that manages it. But, 'lo and behold, Bush doesn't agree (and seriously, does he ever agree with something, except that "Resistance is futile. Terrorists will be assimilated."). On one hand, we can understand that the Internet was mainly developed and funded in the States. On the other hand, it'll be like saying "No one can make paper, except China". You can't control the Internet, simply because its users will not agree with it. Try protecting ICANN, and see how long it will last if the rest of the world makes another comittee?

Why are they so dumb though? What possible good can you obtain, if you go against everyone else's will? No matter how many soldiers you have, you still can't force your political views and system. Look, Bush can't even invade Irak properly. Now he's saying what, "I shall rule over the Internet with my mighty force"? Because, what will happen if everyone else decides to create their organization to manage their Internet? He will not succeed in excluding everyone else from the Internet. He'll manage to emprison his own country within their own big Intranet. There is this great game, called Go. Managers and decision makers should all learn it, it could make them more intelligent, or at least more thoughtful.

Talking about thoughtfulness, most people should know by now that music compagnies feel Steve Jobs is ripping them off. Because, seriously, 0.99$ for an mp3 song that doesn't even cost them the physical CD is clearly not enough. We should up it to the price people pay for cellphone rings, maybe? I find their claim to be ridiculous. But look, there is worse. Threatening to scalp iTunes? For fuck's sake. They should realize that no one, no one would pay 0.99$ per song, encoded in a lossy protocol, if it weren't for mp3 players such as the iPod. It would give me the choice between having a CD, being able to backup it and encode better quality mp3, or simply having an mp3 that I could lose if my HD dies. Good job. Give me your cash, because else, I'll shoot myself in the foot. A great argument, Jobs should tremble in his sleep.

Also, check this site -beware (chocolate-chip) cookies and russian scriptings. In the Holy name of the Bald Eagle, I bless you. Har. Because the national animal is also bald. Funny.

3 Comments:

At 9:36 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hehe yeah I read about that a couple days ago... Truth is... as long as they don't _try_ to control it too much it doesn't really matter where the infrastructure is. I have to admit that it would kind of piss me off to have set up this huge thing and see its control taken away from me. (In fact it should be their own choice to hand over things to the UN (but I'm dreaming here))

However, as soon as they try to purge it or use it to fight terrorism or whatever... The people (tm) will bitch until they either stop or the control is relinquished to the UN. That stunt would most likely not be good for their economy. So things are likely to stay as they are unless there's very good reasons to transfer control to the UN.

On the internet resides a freedom much greater than the one advocated by the US. Their attemps to restrict that freedom have already proven fruitless. (see P2P wars)

I'm tired. Sue me.

 
At 11:00 AM, Blogger Someone said...

The people(tm) don't care. And if they do, it doesn't change much. If the infrastructure stays there, and is still controlled by that country, then many things can happen. Sure, if we're lucky, nothing too bad will happen while the present administration rules. But if they decide to use it to "fight terrorism" (or just tie you up and remove your Internet rights), what will you do? Manifest your discontent in your street all over the world? Because that really changed a lot for the Irak war. :(

 
At 8:15 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Maybe another, UN-run internet project will start up somewhere? I don't think the framework's technology is all that secret.

Someone that removes the people's internet rights surely can't stay in government for long anyways.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home